Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] ufs: replace ll_rw_block()

[Jan Kara]

On Thu 01-09-22 21:35:02, Zhang Yi wrote:
> ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
> guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
> could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
> been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ufs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ufs/balloc.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> index bd810d8239f2..2436e3f82147 100644
> --- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
> @@ -295,14 +295,10 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct inode *inode, sector_t beg,
>  
>  			if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
>  					map_bh(bh, inode->i_sb, oldb + pos);
> -			if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -				ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
> -				wait_on_buffer(bh);
> -				if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> -					ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
> -						  "read of block failed\n");
> -					break;
> -				}
> +			if (bh_read(bh, 0) < 0) {
> +				ufs_error(inode->i_sb, __func__,
> +					  "read of block failed\n");
> +				break;
>  			}
>  
>  			UFSD(" change from %llu to %llu, pos %u\n",
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR