Re: [syzbot] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in truncate_inode_pages_range
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Sep 01 2022 - 19:25:09 EST
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:13:36 -0700 syzbot <syzbot+5867885efe39089b339b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 89b749d8552d Merge tag 'fbdev-for-6.0-rc3' of git://git.ke..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14b9661b080000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=911efaff115942bb
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5867885efe39089b339b
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> userspace arch: i386
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+5867885efe39089b339b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ntfs3: loop0: Different NTFS' sector size (1024) and media sector size (512)
> ntfs3: loop0: RAW NTFS volume: Filesystem size 0.00 Gb > volume size 0.00 Gb. Mount in read-only
> ================================================================================
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in mm/truncate.c:366:18
> index 254 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [15]'
That's
index = indices[folio_batch_count(&fbatch) - 1] + 1;
I looked. I see no way in which fbatch.nr got a value of 255.
I must say, the the code looks rather hacky. Isn't there a more
type-friendly way of doing this?