Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: temperature: mlx90632 Change return value of sensor measurement channel

From: Crt Mori
Date: Sun Sep 04 2022 - 11:28:14 EST


On Sun, 4 Sept 2022 at 17:23, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 00:24:22 +0200
> cmo@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > From: Crt Mori <cmo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The current EINVAL value is more applicable to embedded library, where
> > user can actually put the fixed value to the sensor. In case of the
> > driver if the value of the channel is invalid it is better in inform
> > userspace that Channel was out of range as that implies more to internal
> > driver error than invalid input. It also makes for easier debugging of
> > where the error comes from during the development.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Crt Mori <cmo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hmm. That's an obscure return value - I think it's mostly going to confuse
> anyone who ever gets it. So not sure this change is wise even though the
> descriptive text for that one does seem very much suited to this usecase.
>
I did get it few times during the development due to read when sensor
is not busy, but the measurement data not yet updated correctly due to
powermode switch. I think I added enough delays all around to avoid
hitting it and with proper power mode switching, but there might be a
case, so it will be easier to spot in the source code in future. I
would not remove it, if that is what you are proposing.

> > ---
> > drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c
> > index 37edd324d6a1..d511d36942d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/temperature/mlx90632.c
> > @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int mlx90632_channel_new_select(int perform_ret, uint8_t *channel_new,
> > *channel_old = 1;
> > break;
> > default:
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + return -ECHRNG;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
>