Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drivers: iio: adc: LTC2499 support

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Sep 04 2022 - 11:40:47 EST


On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:16:59 +0300
Ciprian Regus <ciprian.regus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The LTC2499 is a 16-channel (eight differential), 24-bit,
> ADC with Easy Drive technology and a 2-wire, I2C interface.
>
> Implement support for the LTC2499 ADC by extending the LTC2497
> driver. A new chip_info struct is added to differentiate between
> chip types and resolutions when reading data from the device.
>
> Datasheet: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/2499fe.pdf
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Regus <ciprian.regus@xxxxxxxxxx>

A few small comments inline, but looks pretty good to me.

Jonathan

> ---
> changes in v2:
> - removed the bitfield.h and bitops.h includes, since they were not needed.
> - removed a blank line.
> - replaced the data buffer for the ltc2497_driverdata with a union.
> - depending on frame size, i2c transfers use either 3 or 4 byte buffers, instead
> of always using a __be32.
> - added a comment which explains the output data format and how does sign extension.
> happen.
> - added the const modifier for the chip_info structs.
> - renamed the chip_info struct to ltc2497_chip_info.
> - renamed the chip_type enum to ltc2497_chip_type
> - added probe fallback to using i2c_device_id in case OF fails.
> - used BITS_TO_BYTES() instead of dividing by 8.
> - used a tab instead of a space in a struct field declaration, which in v1 appeared as
> if the line was deleted and added back.
> - added back a trailing comma.
> - rearranged variable declaration lines so that longer ones would be first.
> - used pointers to a chip info struct in the i2c_device_id table, instead of enums.
> drivers/iio/adc/ltc2496.c | 8 ++++-
> drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497-core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.h | 11 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2496.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2496.c
> index dfb3bb5997e5..bf89d5ae19af 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2496.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2496.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/iio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>
> #include "ltc2497.h"
>
> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ static int ltc2496_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
> st->spi = spi;
> st->common_ddata.result_and_measure = ltc2496_result_and_measure;
> + st->common_ddata.chip_info = device_get_match_data(dev);

Hmm. This driver doesn't provide the other i2c registration path
(i2c_device_id table) so this is fine. Adding that table can be a problem
for whoever needs it sometime in the future (I'm fine with patches to add
it though if anyone wants to write one!)
>
> return ltc2497core_probe(dev, indio_dev);
> }
> @@ -85,8 +87,12 @@ static void ltc2496_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> ltc2497core_remove(indio_dev);
> }
>
> +static const struct ltc2497_chip_info ltc2496_info = {
> + .resolution = 16,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id ltc2496_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "lltc,ltc2496", },
> + { .compatible = "lltc,ltc2496", .data = &ltc2496_info, },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc2496_of_match);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497-core.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497-core.c
> index 2a485c8a1940..b2752399402c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497-core.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int ltc2497core_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return ret;
>
> *val = ret / 1000;
> - *val2 = 17;
> + *val2 = ddata->chip_info->resolution + 1;
>
> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.c
> index f7c786f37ceb..2f660015f34b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/iio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>
> #include "ltc2497.h"
>
> @@ -19,11 +20,16 @@ struct ltc2497_driverdata {
> /* this must be the first member */
> struct ltc2497core_driverdata common_ddata;
> struct i2c_client *client;
> + u32 recv_size;
> + u32 sub_lsb;
> /*
> * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) may require the
> * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
> */
> - __be32 buf __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
> + union {
> + __be32 d32;
> + u8 d8[3];
> + } data __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
> };
>
> static int ltc2497_result_and_measure(struct ltc2497core_driverdata *ddata,
> @@ -34,13 +40,29 @@ static int ltc2497_result_and_measure(struct ltc2497core_driverdata *ddata,
> int ret;
>
> if (val) {
> - ret = i2c_master_recv(st->client, (char *)&st->buf, 3);
> + if (st->recv_size == 3)
> + ret = i2c_master_recv(st->client, (char *)&st->data.d8, st->recv_size);
> + else
> + ret = i2c_master_recv(st->client, (char *)&st->data.d32, st->recv_size);
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&st->client->dev, "i2c_master_recv failed\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> - *val = (be32_to_cpu(st->buf) >> 14) - (1 << 17);
> + /*
> + * The data format is 16/24 bit 2s complement, but with an upper sign bit on the
> + * resolution + 1 position, which is set for positive values only. Given this
> + * bit's value, subtracting BIT(resolution + 1) from the ADC's result is
> + * equivalent to a sign extension.

Description looks good to me. Thanks for adding.

> + */
> + if (st->recv_size == 3) {
> + *val = (get_unaligned_be24(st->data.d8) >> st->sub_lsb)
> + - BIT(ddata->chip_info->resolution + 1);
> + } else {
> + *val = (be32_to_cpu(st->data.d32) >> st->sub_lsb)
> + - BIT(ddata->chip_info->resolution + 1);
> + }
> }
>

>
> +static const struct ltc2497_chip_info ltc2497_info[] = {
> + [TYPE_LTC2497] = {
> + .resolution = 16,
> + .name = NULL,
> + },
> + [TYPE_LTC2499] = {
> + .resolution = 24,
> + .name = "ltc2499",
> + },
> +};
> +
> static const struct i2c_device_id ltc2497_id[] = {
> - { "ltc2497", 0 },
> + { "ltc2497", (kernel_ulong_t)&ltc2497_info[TYPE_LTC2497] },
> + { "ltc2499", (kernel_ulong_t)&ltc2497_info[TYPE_LTC2497] },

TYPE_LTC2499

Guess you haven't tested this particular path but should be easy to
force it by not setting the of_device_id table pointer (or you could
use a board file but that's more trouble than ti's worth).

> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ltc2497_id);
>
> static const struct of_device_id ltc2497_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "lltc,ltc2497", },
> + { .compatible = "lltc,ltc2497", .data = &ltc2497_info[TYPE_LTC2497] },
> + { .compatible = "lltc,ltc2499", .data = &ltc2497_info[TYPE_LTC2499] },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltc2497_of_match);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.h b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.h
> index d0b42dd6b8ad..95f6a5f4d4a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ltc2497.h
> @@ -4,9 +4,20 @@
> #define LTC2497_CONFIG_DEFAULT LTC2497_ENABLE
> #define LTC2497_CONVERSION_TIME_MS 150ULL
>
> +enum ltc2497_chip_type {
> + TYPE_LTC2496,

Hmm. this is a little interesting given there is no
such entry in the info table so that table will get pushed out
to have an empty first entry. Maybe push this chip_type definition
down into the relevant c file and drop the LTC2496 entry (which will
then seem fine as that .c file doesn't cover that part.

> + TYPE_LTC2497,
> + TYPE_LTC2499,
> +};
> +