On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 03:04:48PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
On 2022/8/26 12:16, Qi Zheng wrote:
On 2022/8/15 20:47, Qi Zheng wrote:
Currently arm64 supports per-CPU IRQ stack, but softirqs
are still handled in the task context.
Since any call to local_bh_enable() at any level in the task's
call stack may trigger a softirq processing run, which could
potentially cause a task stack overflow if the combined stack
footprints exceed the stack's size, let's run these softirqs
on the IRQ stack as well.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802065325.39740-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220708094950.41944-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220707110511.52129-1-zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Changelog in v2 -> v3:
- rebase onto the v6.0-rc1
Hi Will,
Are we good to merge this patch? Or if there is anything else I need to
do, please let me know. :)
I'm expecting Catalin to pick this one up for 6.1.
Will