Re: [PATCH] KVM: Reduce the execution of one instruction

[Liam Ni]

On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 00:14, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "KVM: x86:" for the shortlog.
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022, Liam Ni wrote:
> > From: Liam Ni <zhiguangni01@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If the condition is met,
>
> Please describe this specific code change, "If the condition is met" is extremely
> generic and doesn't help the reader understand what change is being made.
>
> > reduce the execution of one instruction.
>
> This is highly speculative, e.g. clang will generate identical output since it's
> trivial for the compiler to observe that ctxt->modrm_reg doesn't need to be read.
>
> And similar to the above "If the condition is met", the shortlog is too generic
> even if it were 100% accurate.
>
> I do think this change is a net positive, but it's beneficial only in making the
> code easier to read.  Shaving a single cheap instruction in a relatively slow path
> isn't sufficient justification even if the compiler isn't clever enough to optimize
> away the load in the first place.
>
> E.g. something like:
>
>   KVM: x86: Clean up ModR/M "reg" initialization in reg op decoding
>
>   Refactor decode_register_operand() to get the ModR/M register if and
>   only if the instruction uses a ModR/M encoding to make it more obvious
>   how the register operand is retrieved.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Liam Ni <zhiguangni01@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > index f8382abe22ff..ebb95f3f9862 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> > @@ -1139,10 +1139,12 @@ static int em_fnstsw(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> >  static void decode_register_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> >                                   struct operand *op)
> >  {
> > -     unsigned reg = ctxt->modrm_reg;
> > +     unsigned int reg;
> >
> >       if (!(ctxt->d & ModRM))
> >               reg = (ctxt->b & 7) | ((ctxt->rex_prefix & 1) << 3);
> > +     else
> > +             reg = ctxt->modrm_reg;
>
> I'd prefer to write this as:
>
>         unsigned int reg;
>
>         if (ctxt->d & ModRM)
>                 reg = ctxt->modrm_reg;
>         else
>                 reg = (ctxt->b & 7) | ((ctxt->rex_prefix & 1) << 3);
>
> so that "is ModRM" check is immediately followed by "get ModRM".
>
> >
> >       if (ctxt->d & Sse) {
> >               op->type = OP_XMM;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
> >

Thanks for the suggestion, I will submit a new patch V2.