Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Code tagging framework and applications

[Kent Overstreet]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:12:45AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Then you have probably missed a huge part of my emails. Please
> re-read. If those arguments are not clear, feel free to ask for
> clarification. Reducing the whole my reasoning and objections to the
> sentence above and calling that vapid and lazy is not only unfair but
> also disrespectful.

What, where you complained about slab's page allocations showing up in the
profile instead of slab, and I pointed out to you that actually each and every
slab call is instrumented, and you're just seeing some double counting (that we
will no doubt fix?)

Or when you complained about allocation sites where it should actually be the
caller that should be instrumented, and I pointed out that it'd be quite easy to
simply change that code to use _kmalloc() and slab_tag_add() directly, if it
becomes an issue.

Of course, if we got that far, we'd have this code to thank for telling us where
to look!

Did I miss anything?