Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API

From: Pali Rohár
Date: Sun Sep 11 2022 - 08:58:53 EST

Next message: Iskren Chernev: "Re: [PATCH 01/40] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,sm6115-pinctrl: fix matching pin config"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 4.14 022/284] SUNRPC: avoid race between mod_timer() and del_timer_sync()"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API"
Next in thread: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday 06 September 2022 15:41:23 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Linus, do you think we should introduce GPIOD_OUT_INACTIVE /
> GPIOD_OUT_ACTIVE or GPIOD_OUT_DEASSERTED / GPIOD_OUT_ASSERTED and
> deprecate existing GPIOD_OUT_LOW and GPIO_OUT_HIGH?

+1 for GPIOD_OUT_INACTIVE / GPIOD_OUT_ACTIVE. It is less misleading than GPIOD_OUT_LOW.

Next message: Iskren Chernev: "Re: [PATCH 01/40] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,sm6115-pinctrl: fix matching pin config"
Previous message: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH 4.14 022/284] SUNRPC: avoid race between mod_timer() and del_timer_sync()"
In reply to: kernel test robot: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API"
Next in thread: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]