Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Propose critical clocks

[Marco Felsch]

On 22-09-13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/09/2022 12:21, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this proposal is to mark clocks as critical. It is somehow inspired by
> > the regulator-always-on property. Since sometimes we can end in circular
> > dependcies if we wanna solve the dependcies for a specific clock
> > provider.
> > 
> > The property is generic so it can be used by every hw clock provider. So
> > it can be seen as generic implementation to [1].
> 
> Missing devicetree list (so no testing), missing bindings. Please follow
> Linux process, run checkpatch and CC necessary people an dlists pointed
> out by get_maintainers.pl.

I just pushd the _proposal_ as reaction of adding a NXP specific
binding. If the clk maintainer(s) would agree to this this proposal I
would update the patchset with bindings and _all_ mail-addresses.

Regards,
  Marco