[PATCH 5.19 026/192] cpufreq: check only freq_table in __resolve_freq()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 6ca7076fbfaeccce173aeab832d76b9e49e1034b ]

There is no need to check if the cpufreq driver implements callback
cpufreq_driver::target_index. The logic in the __resolve_freq uses
the frequency table available in the policy. It doesn't matter if the
driver provides 'target_index' or 'target' callback. It just has to
populate the 'policy->freq_table'.

Thus, check only frequency table during the frequency resolving call.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 2cad427741647..f9fd1b6c15d42 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
 
-	if (!cpufreq_driver->target_index)
+	if (!policy->freq_table)
 		return target_freq;
 
 	idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
-- 
2.35.1