Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4250: Add support for oneplus-billie2
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 17:30:18 EST
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 05:32:13PM +0300, Iskren Chernev wrote:
> Add initial support for OnePlus Nord N100, based on SM4250. Currently
> working:
> - boots
> - usb
> - buildin flash storage (UFS)
> - SD card reader
>
> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts | 241 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 242 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> index f4126f7e7640..5d2570b600e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-xiaomi-polaris.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-shift-axolotl.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm850-samsung-w737.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm6350-sony-xperia-lena-pdx213.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b9094f1efca0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm4250-oneplus-billie2.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
Would it be possible for you to dual license this?
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@xxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sm4250.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "OnePlus Nord N100";
> + compatible = "oneplus,billie2", "qcom,sm4250";
> +
> + /* required for bootloader to select correct board */
> + qcom,msm-id = <0x1a1 0x10000 0x1bc 0x10000>;
> + qcom,board-id = <0x1000b 0x00>;
> +
> + aliases {
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + stdout-path = "framebuffer0";
> +
> + framebuffer0: framebuffer@9d400000 {
> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
> + reg = <0 0x5c000000 0 (1600 * 720 * 4)>;
> + width = <720>;
> + height = <1600>;
> + stride = <(720 * 4)>;
> + format = "a8r8g8b8";
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&xo_board {
> + clock-frequency = <19200000>;
> +};
> +
> +&sleep_clk {
> + clock-frequency = <32764>;
> +};
> +
> +&reserved_memory {
As the number of nodes grow it would be nice if these were sorted
alphabetically.
> + bootloader_log_mem: memory@5fff7000 {
> + reg = <0x00 0x5fff7000 0x00 0x8000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +
> + ramoops@cbe00000 {
> + compatible = "ramoops";
> + reg = <0x0 0xcbe00000 0x0 0x400000>;
> + record-size = <0x40000>;
> + pmsg-size = <0x200000>;
> + console-size = <0x40000>;
> + ftrace-size = <0x40000>;
> + };
> +
> + param_mem: memory@cc200000 {
> + reg = <0x00 0xcc200000 0x00 0x100000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +
> + mtp_mem: memory@cc300000 {
> + reg = <0x00 0xcc300000 0x00 0xb00000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&usb3 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
[..]
> +&rpm_requests {
> + regulators-0 {
Is there a reason why you don't call this node pm6125-regulators ?
> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm6125-regulators";
> +
> + vreg_s6a: s6 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <320000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1456000>;
> + };
[..]
> + vreg_l24a: l24 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2704000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3544000>;
> + };
Just as a heads up, by not ensuring that your regulators are in
high-power-mode you risk seeing brown-outs - something we keep running
into for e.g. SD-cards.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.37.2
>