Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the execve tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Sep 14 2022 - 02:21:13 EST


Hi Andrew,

[Readded cc's]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:03:02 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:55:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/exec.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 33a2d6bc3480 ("Revert "fs/exec: allow to unshare a time namespace on vfork+exec"")
> >
> > from the execve tree and commit:
> >
> > 33a2d6bc3480 ("Revert "fs/exec: allow to unshare a time namespace on vfork+exec"")
> >
> > from the mm tree.
>
> Confused. They're the same commit?

Sorry about that (still getting used to copy/paste in a VM on a Mac :-()

The latter one should have been:

65d31cfbc445 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: support page table walks")

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgp067MguSzjy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature