Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for memory sandbox

From: Sibi Sankar
Date: Wed Sep 14 2022 - 06:11:31 EST




On 9/8/22 6:53 PM, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
Update pil driver with SMMU mapping for allowing authorised
memory access to ADSP firmware, by carveout reserved adsp memory
region from device tree file.

Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since V5:
-- Remove adsp_rproc_unmap_smmu, adsp_of_unmap_smmu, adsp_of_map_smmu and
adsp_rproc_map_smmu functions.
-- Remove find_loaded_rsc_table call back initialization.
-- Rename adsp_sandbox_needed to has_iommu.
Changes since V4:
-- Split the code and add appropriate APIs for resource allocation and free.
-- Update adsp_unmap_smmu with missing free ops call.
-- Update normalizing length value in adsp_of_unmap_smmu.
Changes since V3:
-- Rename is_adsp_sb_needed to adsp_sandbox_needed.
-- Add smmu unmapping in error case and in adsp stop.
Changes since V2:
-- Replace platform_bus_type with adsp->dev->bus.
-- Use API of_parse_phandle_with_args() instead of of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args().
-- Replace adsp->is_wpss with adsp->is_adsp.
-- Update error handling in adsp_start().

drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
index ccb5592..e55d593 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iommu.h>
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
@@ -48,6 +49,8 @@
#define LPASS_PWR_ON_REG 0x10
#define LPASS_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
+#define SID_MASK_DEFAULT 0xF
+
#define QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR 0x38
#define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
#define QDSP6SS_SLEEP_CBCR 0x3c
@@ -333,6 +336,42 @@ static int adsp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
return 0;
}
+static void adsp_unmap_smmu(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
+
+ iommu_unmap(rproc->domain, adsp->mem_phys, adsp->mem_size);
+}
+
+static int adsp_map_smmu(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, struct rproc *rproc)

you could perhaps name the func to adsp_map_carveout/adsp_unmap_carveout


+{
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+ long long sid;
+ unsigned long iova;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!rproc->domain)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(adsp->dev->of_node, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", 0, &args);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ sid = args.args[0] & SID_MASK_DEFAULT;
+
+ /* Add SID configuration for ADSP Firmware to SMMU */
+ iova = adsp->mem_phys | (sid << 32);
+
+ ret = iommu_map(rproc->domain, iova, adsp->mem_phys,
+ adsp->mem_size, IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(adsp->dev, "Unable to map ADSP Physical Memory\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
{
struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
@@ -343,9 +382,17 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ if (adsp->has_iommu) {
+ ret = adsp_map_smmu(adsp, rproc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(adsp->dev, "ADSP smmu mapping failed\n");
+ goto disable_irqs;
+ }
+ }
+
ret = clk_prepare_enable(adsp->xo);
if (ret)
- goto disable_irqs;
+ goto adsp_smmu_unmap;
ret = qcom_rproc_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds,
adsp->proxy_pd_count);
@@ -401,6 +448,9 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
qcom_rproc_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
disable_xo_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->xo);
+adsp_smmu_unmap:
+ if (adsp->has_iommu)
+ adsp_unmap_smmu(rproc);
disable_irqs:
qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&adsp->q6v5);
@@ -429,6 +479,9 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
if (ret)
dev_err(adsp->dev, "failed to shutdown: %d\n", ret);
+ if (adsp->has_iommu)
+ adsp_unmap_smmu(rproc);
+
handover = qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&adsp->q6v5);
if (handover)
qcom_adsp_pil_handover(&adsp->q6v5);