Re: [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: check mm when killing accessing process

From: Shuai Xue
Date: Wed Sep 14 2022 - 21:37:11 EST




在 2022/9/15 AM6:35, Andrew Morton 写道:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:49:35 +0800 Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The GHES code calls memory_failure_queue() from IRQ context to queue work
>> into workqueue and schedule it on the current CPU. Then the work is
>> processed in memory_failure_work_func() by kworker and calls
>> memory_failure().
>>
>> When a page is already poisoned, commit a3f5d80ea401 ("mm,hwpoison: send
>> SIGBUS with error virutal address") make memory_failure() call
>> kill_accessing_process() that:
>>
>> - holds mmap locking of current->mm
>> - does pagetable walk to find the error virtual address
>> - and sends SIGBUS to the current process with error info.
>>
>> However, the mm of kworker is not valid. Therefore, check mm when killing
>> accessing process.
>
> Thanks.
>
> When fixing a bug, please always describe the user-visible effects of
> tha bug. I'm thinking "null pointer deref crashes the kernel".

Got it. Thank you :)

>
>> Fixes: a3f5d80ea401 ("mm,hwpoison: send SIGBUS with error virutal address")
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'll add cc:stable.

Thanks.

>
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -743,6 +743,9 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
>> };
>> priv.tk.tsk = p;
>>
>> + if (!p->mm)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> mmap_read_lock(p->mm);
>> ret = walk_page_range(p->mm, 0, TASK_SIZE, &hwp_walk_ops,
>> (void *)&priv);
>> @@ -751,6 +754,7 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
>> else
>> ret = 0;
>> mmap_read_unlock(p->mm);
>> +
>> return ret > 0 ? -EHWPOISON : -EFAULT;
>> }
>
> This is an unrelated change which doesn't appear to match the style in
> memory-failure.c, so I'll drop this hunk.

I see, thanks.

Cheers,
Shuai