Re: [PATCH] gpio: tpmx86: fix uninitialized variable girq

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Fri Sep 16 2022 - 03:56:38 EST


On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:08:10 +0100,
Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 3:36 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:18:42 +0100,
> > Dongliang Mu <dzm91@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The commit 924610607f19 ("gpio: tpmx86: Move PM device over to
> > > irq domain") adds a dereference of girq that may be uninitialized.
> > >
> > > Fix this by initializing girq and checking irq before invoking
> > > irq_domain_set_pm_device.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 924610607f19 ("gpio: tpmx86: Move PM device over to irq domain")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > index fa4bc7481f9a..bdef182c11c2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c
> > > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > struct tqmx86_gpio_data *gpio;
> > > struct gpio_chip *chip;
> > > - struct gpio_irq_chip *girq;
> > > + struct gpio_irq_chip *girq = NULL;
> > > void __iomem *io_base;
> > > struct resource *res;
> > > int ret, irq;
> > > @@ -315,7 +315,9 @@ static int tqmx86_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > goto out_pm_dis;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - irq_domain_set_pm_device(girq->domain, dev);
> > > + if (girq) {
> > > + irq_domain_set_pm_device(girq->domain, dev);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > dev_info(dev, "GPIO functionality initialized with %d pins\n",
> > > chip->ngpio);
> >
> > I wonder if a better fix wouldn't be to directly hoist the
> > irq_domain_set_pm_device() call into the 'if (irq > 0)' block.
>
> If irq_domain_set_pm_device has no dependency on
> devm_gpiochip_add_data, we can directly move irq_domain_set_pm_device
> to the if block.

There is no dependency there, and you can convince yourself by looking
at the (trivial) code.

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.