Re: [PATCH] carl9170: use strscpy() is more robust and safer

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
>
> That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c
> index 1ab09e1c9ec5..4c1aecd1163c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/fw.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void carl9170_fw_info(struct ar9170 *ar)
>  			 CARL9170FW_GET_MONTH(fw_date),
>  			 CARL9170FW_GET_DAY(fw_date));
>  
> -		strlcpy(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version, motd_desc->release,
> +		strscpy(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version, motd_desc->release,
>  			sizeof(ar->hw->wiphy->fw_version));

Already changed in:

https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bf99f11df4de

Please use latest trees to avoid duplicate work.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches