Re: [PATCH v3] docs: x86: replace do_IRQ int the entry_64.rst with common_interrupt()

[tuo cao]

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> 于2022年9月16日周五 01:35写道：
>
> Tuo Cao <91tuocao@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > do_IRQ has been replaced by common_interrupt in commit
> > fa5e5c409213 ("x86/entry: Use idtentry for interrupts").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tuo Cao <91tuocao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst b/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > index e433e08f7018..0afdce3c06f4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst
> > @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ Some of these entries are:
> >   - interrupt: An array of entries.  Every IDT vector that doesn't
> >     explicitly point somewhere else gets set to the corresponding
> >     value in interrupts.  These point to a whole array of
> > -   magically-generated functions that make their way to do_IRQ with
> > -   the interrupt number as a parameter.
> > +   magically-generated functions that make their way to common_interrupt()
> > +   with the interrupt number as a parameter.
> >
> >   - APIC interrupts: Various special-purpose interrupts for things
> >     like TLB shootdown.
>
> So why have you sent a "v3" the same day?  It doesn't look like anything
> has changed...?
"v3" has wrote common_interrupt() with the brackets.

>
> Thanks,
>
> jon