Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/btf: Use btf_type_str() whenever possible

[Peilin Ye]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:37:46AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> This clean up makes sense.  The patch cannot be applied though [0], so it is
> marked as 'Changes Requested'.  Also, where is the cad4657ba2ce coming from?
> It can't be found in the bpf-next tree.  Please rebase on the bpf-next and
> resend.

Ah, I will fix it in v2 soon.

Thanks,
Peilin Ye