Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/fpu: Clarify the XSTATE clearing only for extended components

[Sean Christopherson]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Commit 087df48c298c ("x86/fpu: Replace KVMs xstate component clearing")
> refactored the MPX state clearing code.
> 
> But, legacy states are not warranted in this routine.

Why not?  I could probably figure it out eventually, but that info should be
provided in the changelog.

> Rename the function to clarify that only extended components are acceptable.

The function rename isn't the interesting part of the patch, explicitly disallowing
"legacy" states is what's interesting.  The shortlog+changelog should reflect that.

> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c   | 7 +++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c             | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> index 503a577814b2..c9d5dc85ca06 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static inline void fpstate_free(struct fpu *fpu) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  /* fpstate-related functions which are exported to KVM */
> -extern void fpstate_clear_xstate_component(struct fpstate *fps, unsigned int xfeature);
> +extern void fpstate_clear_extended_xstate(struct fpstate *fps, unsigned int xfeature);
>  
>  extern u64 xstate_get_guest_group_perm(void);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index d7676cfc32eb..a35f91360e3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -1371,14 +1371,17 @@ void xrstors(struct xregs_state *xstate, u64 mask)
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> -void fpstate_clear_xstate_component(struct fpstate *fps, unsigned int xfeature)
> +void fpstate_clear_extended_xstate(struct fpstate *fps, unsigned int xfeature)
>  {
>  	void *addr = get_xsave_addr(&fps->regs.xsave, xfeature);
>  
> +	if (xfeature <= XFEATURE_SSE)

This should WARN_ON_ONCE(), silently doing nothing in the presence of buggy code
isn't much better than clobbering state.

> +		return;
> +
>  	if (addr)
>  		memset(addr, 0, xstate_sizes[xfeature]);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpstate_clear_xstate_component);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpstate_clear_extended_xstate);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 43a6a7efc6ec..82ab270ea734 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -11760,8 +11760,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  		if (init_event)
>  			kvm_put_guest_fpu(vcpu);
>  
> -		fpstate_clear_xstate_component(fpstate, XFEATURE_BNDREGS);
> -		fpstate_clear_xstate_component(fpstate, XFEATURE_BNDCSR);
> +		fpstate_clear_extended_xstate(fpstate, XFEATURE_BNDREGS);
> +		fpstate_clear_extended_xstate(fpstate, XFEATURE_BNDCSR);

>From a KVM perspective, I strongly prefer the existing name.  The "component"
part makes it very clear that the helper clears a single component, whereas it's
not obvious at first glances that the version without "component" only affects
the specified feature.

The obvious alternative is something like fpstate_clear_extended_xstate_component(),
but I don't really see the point.  "xstate" is "extended state" after all, which
is partly why I find fpstate_clear_extended_xstate() confusing; it makes me think
the helper is for some fancy "extended extended state".