Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] i2c: acpi: Use ACPI wake capability bit to set wake_irq

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 05:57:55PM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> Device tree already has a mechanism to pass the wake_irq. It does this
> by looking for the wakeup-source property and setting the
> I2C_CLIENT_WAKE flag. This CL adds the ACPI equivalent. It uses the
> ACPI interrupt wake flag to determine if the interrupt can be used to
> wake the system. Previously the i2c drivers had to make assumptions and
> blindly enable the wake IRQ. This can cause spurious wake events. e.g.,
> If there is a device with an Active Low interrupt and the device gets
> powered off while suspending, the interrupt line will go low since it's
> no longer powered and wakes the system. For this reason we should
> respect the board designers wishes and honor the wake bit defined on the
> interrupt.

Okay, let's go with this variant, but I'm afraid that in time we may come up
to the proposed (generic structure for ACPI IRQ parameters which can be used
in a few places).

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Convert wake_capable to bool
> - Only update wake_capable pointer once
> - Move wake_capable local into local block
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Look at wake_cabple bit for IRQ/Interrupt resources
> 
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c |  8 +++++++-
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h      |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> index c762a879c4cc6b..b3d68a9659ff4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_acpi_ignored_device_ids[] = {
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> +struct i2c_acpi_irq_context {
> +	int irq;
> +	bool wake_capable;
> +};
> +
>  static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  			      struct i2c_acpi_lookup *lookup)
>  {
> @@ -170,11 +175,14 @@ static int i2c_acpi_do_lookup(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  
>  static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>  {
> -	int *irq = data;
> +	struct i2c_acpi_irq_context *irq_ctx = data;
>  	struct resource r;
>  
> -	if (*irq <= 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
> -		*irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> +	if (irq_ctx->irq <= 0 && acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r)) {
> +		irq_ctx->irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
> +		irq_ctx->wake_capable =
> +			!!(r.flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE);
> +	}

Maybe

	if (irq_ctx->irq > 0)
		return 1;

	if (!acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r))
		return 1;

	irq_ctx->irq = i2c_dev_irq_from_resources(&r, 1);
	irq_ctx->wake_capable = !!(r.flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE);

?

>  	return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
>  }

Also not sure why the callback is not called i2c_acpi_add_irq_resource().
But it probably can be done in a separate change.

> @@ -182,31 +190,38 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>  /**
>   * i2c_acpi_get_irq - get device IRQ number from ACPI
>   * @client: Pointer to the I2C client device
> + * @wake_capable: Set to true if the IRQ is wake capable
>   *
>   * Find the IRQ number used by a specific client device.
>   *
>   * Return: The IRQ number or an error code.
>   */
> -int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev);
>  	struct list_head resource_list;
> -	int irq = -ENOENT;
> +	struct i2c_acpi_irq_context irq_ctx = {
> +		.irq = -ENOENT,
> +	};
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
>  
>  	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> -				     i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> +				     i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq_ctx);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>  
> -	if (irq == -ENOENT)
> -		irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, 0);
> +	if (irq_ctx.irq == -ENOENT)
> +		irq_ctx.irq = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_wake_get(adev, 0,
> +							 &irq_ctx.wake_capable);
> +
> +	if (wake_capable)
> +		*wake_capable = irq_ctx.wake_capable;
>  
> -	return irq;
> +	return irq_ctx.irq;
>  }
>  
>  static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 91007558bcb260..c4debd46c6340f 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -487,8 +487,14 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  			if (irq == -EINVAL || irq == -ENODATA)
>  				irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>  		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> -			irq = i2c_acpi_get_irq(client);
> +			bool wake_capable;
> +
> +			irq = i2c_acpi_get_irq(client, &wake_capable);

> +

Unneeded blank line.

> +			if (irq > 0 && wake_capable)
> +				client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_WAKE;
>  		}

> +

Ditto. (This even looks like a stray change)

>  		if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>  			status = irq;
>  			goto put_sync_adapter;
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> index 87e2c914f1c57b..1247e6e6e97517 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h
> @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static inline int __i2c_check_suspended(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
>  
> -int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client);
> +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable);
>  #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  static inline void i2c_acpi_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap) { }
>  
> -static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static inline int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, bool *wake_capable)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko