Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] riscv: dts: renesas: Add minimal DTS for Renesas RZ/Five SMARC EVK

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Prabhakar,

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 8:17 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Enable the minimal blocks required for booting the Renesas RZ/Five
> SMARC EVK with initramfs.
>
> Below are the blocks enabled:
> - CPG
> - CPU0
> - DDR (memory regions)
> - PINCTRL
> - PLIC
> - SCIF0
>
> Note we have deleted the nodes from the DT for which support needs to be
> added for RZ/Five SoC and are enabled by RZ/G2UL SMARC EVK SoM/carrier
> board DTS/I.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2->v3
> * Dropped RB tags from Conor and Geert
> * Now re-using the SoM and carrier board DTS/I from RZ/G2UL

Thanks for the update!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043f01-smarc.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/Five SMARC EVK
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +/*
> + * DIP-Switch SW1 setting
> + * 1 : High; 0: Low
> + * SW1-2 : SW_SD0_DEV_SEL      (0: uSD; 1: eMMC)
> + * SW1-3 : SW_ET0_EN_N         (0: ETHER0; 1: CAN0, CAN1, SSI1, RSPI1)
> + * Please change below macros according to SW1 setting on SoM

"on the SoM" (like in r9a07g043u11-smarc.dts)?

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/Five SMARC EVK SOM
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> + */
> +
> +#include <arm64/renesas/rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi>
> +
> +/ {
> +       aliases {
> +               /delete-property/ ethernet0;
> +               /delete-property/ ethernet1;

OK

> +       };
> +
> +       chosen {
> +               bootargs = "ignore_loglevel";
> +       };
> +};
> +
> +#if (SW_SW0_DEV_SEL)
> +/delete-node/ &adc;
> +#endif
> +
> +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)
> +/delete-node/ &eth0;
> +#endif
> +/delete-node/ &eth1;
> +
> +/delete-node/ &ostm1;
> +/delete-node/ &ostm2;

Given they are all placeholders, do you really need to delete them?
(more below)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds