Re: Usefulness of CONFIG_MACH_JZ47*

[Paul Cercueil]

Le mar., sept. 20 2022 at 14:31:38 +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller 
<hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
> >  Am 20.09.2022 um 11:09 schrieb Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >  Hi Nikolaus,
> >
> >  Le mar., sept. 20 2022 at 08:31:30 +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller 
> > <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > >  Hi Paul,
> > >  it seems as if there aren't many places left over where the 
> > > MACH_JZ47* configs are still in use:
> > >  drivers/char/hw_ramdom/Kconfig
> > >  drivers/clk/ingenic/Kconfig
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/Kconfig
> > >  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-ingenic.c
> > >  Is it possible to get rid of them and just have 
> > > CONFIG_MACH_INGENIC_GENERIC?
> > >  This might simplify my defconfig for multiple machines.
> >
> >  CONFIG_MIPS_GENERIC_KERNEL=y
>
> This breaks compilation for me, e.g.
>
> arch/mips/mm/cache.c:203:6: error: 'cpu_has_tx39_cache' undeclared 
> (first use in this function)

v6.0-rc does not have 'cpu_has_tx39_cache' anywhere in that file, or in 
arch/mips/ for that matter. It was removed in v5.18.

And a v5.17 kernel compiles fine here with these options enabled. So 
it's a problem on your side, I guess.

> >  CONFIG_BOARD_INGENIC=y
>
> This config option does not exist (at least in v6.0-rc). Probably you 
> refer to CONFIG_INGENIC_GENERIC_BOARD.

No, I do not, and yes, it exists.

> As far as I see, this does not choose to build any device tree blob.
>
> I tried some patch to get the .dtb built, but the resulting kernel 
> does not show any activity.
>
> If I e.g. switch back from CONFIG_INGENIC_GENERIC_BOARD=y to 
> CONFIG_JZ4780_CI20=y the kernel works.

Because in the first case you build a generic kernel, which does not 
embed any .dtb, and you are responsible for providing the kernel with 
the blob at boot time; while if you build with CONFIG_JZ4780_CI20=y it 
embeds the .dtb inside the kernel.

You can embed the .dtb into the generic kernel at compile-time too, 
have a look at "Kernel type -> Kernel appended dtb support." Not sure 
why you'd want that for a generic kernel, though.

> >  Then you can support all Ingenic-based boards alongside other MIPS 
> > boards.
>
> Yes, I know, but why are the MACH_JZ47* not replaced by 
> CONFIG_MACH_INGENIC_GENERIC if they are almost unused or completely 
> removed?

They *are* used.

> BTW: there are also seems to be some board specific CONFIGs in 
> processor specific code (e.g. CONFIG_JZ4780_CI20 in irqchip code).

rgrep CI20 drivers/irqchip/

returns nothing for me.

> So selecting a MACH is not sufficient to get these features.
>
> All this looks a little fragile and incomplete... Maybe if I find 
> some time (which is unfortunately quite unlikely) I can propose some 
> fixes.

It is not "fragile and incomplete", it works as intended, and it's a 
feature I use often.

-Paul