Re: [PATCH] coresight: Use new autogenerated sysreg definitions

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Tue Sep 20 2022 - 14:08:31 EST


On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 06:07:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > BTW, for some reason we don't have CoreSight enabled in defconfig, not
> > > even as a module. Would you mind sending a patch for this and enable (as
> > > modules) all the relevant drivers? We miss any test coverage here.
> >
> > The PMU counters are in the same camp. Enabling them breaks the kernel
> > build. I wonder whether we should go for changing the default in Kconfig
> > directly rather than defconfig.
>
> I sent a patch for the PMU counters defconfig yesterday.

The defconfig patches tend to fall through the cracks. I'll try to pick
some of them up.

BTW, do you plan to send a patch for the arm_spe_pmu build failures
(unless you did already and I missed it):

linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0':
linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:677:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
677 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_2:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:677:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:679:14: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP'?
679 | case ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_8_3:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_IMP
linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function '__arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe':
linux/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:961:52: error: 'ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT'?
961 | ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT

--
Catalin