Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti: phy-gmii-sel: Add bindings for J721e

From: Siddharth Vadapalli
Date: Wed Sep 21 2022 - 03:24:04 EST


Hello Krzysztof,

On 21/09/22 12:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/09/2022 06:27, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>>>> + then:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + ti,qsgmii-main-ports:
>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>> + maxItems: 2
>>>> + items:
>>>> + minimum: 1
>>>> + maximum: 8
>>>> +
>>>> - if:
>>>> not:
>>>> properties:
>>>> @@ -94,6 +133,7 @@ allOf:
>>>> contains:
>>>> enum:
>>>> - ti,j7200-cpsw5g-phy-gmii-sel
>>>> + - ti,j721e-cpsw9g-phy-gmii-sel
>>>> then:
>>>> properties:
>>>> ti,qsgmii-main-ports: false
>>>
>>> This is interesting here... Did you test the bindings with your DTS?
>>
>> Yes, I tried it out with different compatibles in the DTS file for the
>> node, making sure that the property "ti,qsgmii-main-ports" is allowed
>> only for the "ti,j7200-cpsw5g-phy-gmii-sel" and the
>> "ti,j721e-cpsw9g-phy-gmii-sel" compatibles. Additionally, I also tested
>> that the "minItems", "maxItems", "minimum" and "maximum" checks apply.
>> All of the rules within the "allOf", are enforced one after the other in
>> sequence, based on my testing. Please let me know in case of any
>> suggestions to implement it in a better way.
>
> Great! I think I see now what I missed previously. The last hunk with
> "ti,qsgmii-main-ports: false" is in a if: with negation ("not:")?

Yes, the newly added compatible "ti,j721e-cpsw9g-phy-gmii-sel" is placed
within an "if:" followed by a "not:", along with the already existing
"ti,j7200-cpsw5g-phy-gmii-sel" compatible. With this,
"ti,qsgmii-main-ports" is allowed only for the aforementioned
compatibles and disallowed for the rest.

Regards,
Siddharth.