RE: [PATCH v5 0/8] i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: bug fixes and new feature support

[Asmaa Mnebhi]

Hi Wolfram,

Is there any requirement to support DTs in i2c drivers?
I would like to remove it in the v6 series because we don't support device tree, only ACPI.

Thank you,
Asmaa

-----Original Message-----
From: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:47 PM
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/8] i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: bug fixes and new feature support

This is a series of patches fixing several bugs and implementing new features.

Bug fixes:
1) Fix the frequency calculation
2) Fix incorrect base address passed during io write
3) prevent stack overflow in mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction()
4) Support lock mechanism to avoid race condition between entities
   using the i2c bus

Cleanup:
5) remove IRQF_ONESHOT flag as it is no longer needed.

Features:
6) Support multi slave functionality
7) Support BlueField-3 SoC
8) Update binding devicetree

What has changed from v4->v5:
Fix build error in the mellanox i2c device tree documentation

Asmaa Mnebhi (8):
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: Fix frequency calculation
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: remove IRQF_ONESHOT
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: incorrect base address passed during io write
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf: prevent stack overflow in
    mlxbf_i2c_smbus_start_transaction()
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: support lock mechanism
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf: add multi slave functionality
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: support BlueField-3 SoC
  i2c: i2c-mlxbf.c: Update binding devicetree

 .../bindings/i2c/mellanox,i2c-mlxbf.yaml      |  48 +-
 MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxbf.c                | 862 ++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 390 deletions(-)

--
2.30.1