Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] media: uvc: Handle cameras with invalid descriptors
From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Wed Sep 21 2022 - 17:16:59 EST
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 09:51:44AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> index 7c4d2f93d351..66d1f5da4ec7 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int uvc_mc_create_links(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> continue;
>
> remote = uvc_entity_by_id(chain->dev, entity->baSourceID[i]);
> - if (remote == NULL)
> + if (remote == NULL || remote->num_pads == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
Yes.
>
> source = (UVC_ENTITY_TYPE(remote) == UVC_TT_STREAMING)
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ static int uvc_mc_create_links(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> if (source == NULL)
> continue;
>
> + if (source->num_pads != remote->num_pads)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
But this I would have dropped, as the media_entity num_pads is
initialized from uvc_entity num_pads and neither are changed after.
> remote_pad = remote->num_pads - 1;
> ret = media_create_pad_link(source, remote_pad,
> sink, i, flags);
>
> regarding making a new patch, whatever is easier for you ;)
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 02:53, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 04:04:55PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > If the source entity does not contain any pads, do not create a link.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> > > index 7c4d2f93d351..1f730cb72e58 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_entity.c
> > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int uvc_mc_create_links(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> > > source = (UVC_ENTITY_TYPE(remote) == UVC_TT_STREAMING)
> > > ? (remote->vdev ? &remote->vdev->entity : NULL)
> > > : &remote->subdev.entity;
> > > - if (source == NULL)
> > > + if (source == NULL || source->num_pads == 0)
> >
> > source->num_pads and remote->num_pads should always be identical, but as
> > the next line uses remote->num_pads, wouldn't it be better to test that
> > variable ? If so, I'd move the test a file lines earlier, with the
> > remote == NULL test.
> >
> > What do you think ? If you agree I can make that change when applying,
> > there's no need for a new version. Otherwise I'll keep the patch as-is.
> >
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > remote_pad = remote->num_pads - 1;
> > >
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart