Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Stop the CLC flow if no link to map buffers on

From: Wenjia Zhang
Date: Thu Sep 22 2022 - 09:08:04 EST




On 22.09.22 10:29, Wen Gu wrote:


On 2022/9/20 14:43, Wen Gu wrote:

There might be a potential race between SMC-R buffer map and
link group termination.

smc_smcr_terminate_all()     | smc_connect_rdma()
--------------------------------------------------------------
                              | smc_conn_create()
for links in smcibdev        |
         schedule links down  |
                              | smc_buf_create()
                              |  \- smcr_buf_map_usable_links()
                              |      \- no usable links found,
                              |         (rmb->mr = NULL)
                              |
                              | smc_clc_send_confirm()
                              |  \- access conn->rmb_desc->mr[]->rkey
                              |     (panic)

During reboot and IB device module remove, all links will be set
down and no usable links remain in link groups. In such situation
smcr_buf_map_usable_links() should return an error and stop the
CLC flow accessing to uninitialized mr.

Fixes: b9247544c1bc ("net/smc: convert static link ID instances to support multiple links")
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/smc/smc_core.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index ebf56cd..df89c2e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ static struct smc_buf_desc *smcr_new_buf_create(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
  static int smcr_buf_map_usable_links(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
                       struct smc_buf_desc *buf_desc, bool is_rmb)
  {
-    int i, rc = 0;
+    int i, rc = 0, cnt = 0;
      /* protect against parallel link reconfiguration */
      mutex_lock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
@@ -2252,9 +2252,12 @@ static int smcr_buf_map_usable_links(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
              rc = -ENOMEM;
              goto out;
          }
+        cnt++;
      }
  out:
      mutex_unlock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
+    if (!rc && !cnt)
+        rc = -EINVAL;
      return rc;
  }

Any comments or reviews are welcome and appreciated.

Thanks,
Wen Gu

Sorry for the late answer!
Good catch! Thank you!

Acked-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>