Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Add ftrace direct call for arm64

From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Thu Sep 22 2022 - 14:02:34 EST


On 9/13/22 6:27 PM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
This series adds ftrace direct call for arm64, which is required to attach
bpf trampoline to fentry.

Although there is no agreement on how to support ftrace direct call on arm64,
no patch has been posted except the one I posted in [1], so this series
continues the work of [1] with the addition of long jump support. Now ftrace
direct call works regardless of the distance between the callsite and custom
trampoline.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220518131638.3401509-2-xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx/

v2:
- Fix compile and runtime errors caused by ftrace_rec_arch_init

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220913063146.74750-1-xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Xu Kuohai (4):
ftrace: Allow users to disable ftrace direct call
arm64: ftrace: Support long jump for ftrace direct call
arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
ftrace: Fix dead loop caused by direct call in ftrace selftest

Given there's just a tiny fraction touching BPF JIT and most are around core arm64,
it probably makes sense that this series goes via Catalin/Will through arm64 tree
instead of bpf-next if it looks good to them. Catalin/Will, thoughts (Ack + bpf-next
could work too, but I'd presume this just results in merge conflicts)?

arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +
arch/arm64/Makefile | 4 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 35 ++++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h | 2 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 6 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 39 ++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c | 14 +++
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 +
include/linux/ftrace.h | 2 +
kernel/trace/Kconfig | 7 +-
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 +-
kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 2 +
14 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Thanks,
Daniel