[PATCH v5 18/30] KVM: kvm_arch.c: Remove _nolock post fix
From: isaku . yamahata
Date: Thu Sep 22 2022 - 14:23:22 EST
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
Now all related callbacks are called under kvm_lock, no point for _nolock
post fix. Remove _nolock post fix for readability with shorter function
names.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_arch.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_arch.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_arch.c
index bcf8b74144e3..e6bf9de18cba 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_arch.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_arch.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
return 0;
}
-static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk)
+static void hardware_enable(void *junk)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
int r;
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk)
}
}
-static void hardware_disable_nolock(void *junk)
+static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_add_vm(struct kvm *kvm, int usage_count)
return 0;
atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0);
- on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_enable, NULL, 1);
if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) {
r = -EBUSY;
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_add_vm(struct kvm *kvm, int usage_count)
r = kvm_arch_post_init_vm(kvm);
err:
if (r)
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
return r;
}
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_del_vm(int usage_count)
if (usage_count)
return 0;
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int usage_count)
* preemption until all arch callbacks are fixed.
*/
preempt_disable();
- hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
+ hardware_enable(NULL);
preempt_enable();
if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) {
atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0);
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int usage_count)
* preemption until all arch callbacks are fixed.
*/
preempt_disable();
- hardware_disable_nolock(NULL);
+ hardware_disable(NULL);
preempt_enable();
}
return 0;
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int usage_count)
int __weak kvm_arch_reboot(int val)
{
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
@@ -153,12 +153,12 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_suspend(int usage_count)
* Because kvm_suspend() is called with interrupt disabled, no
* need to disable preemption.
*/
- hardware_disable_nolock(NULL);
+ hardware_disable(NULL);
return 0;
}
void __weak kvm_arch_resume(int usage_count)
{
if (usage_count)
- hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
+ hardware_enable(NULL);
}
--
2.25.1