[PATCH v5 1/4] Documentation/x86: Explain the purpose for dynamic features

From: Chang S. Bae
Date: Thu Sep 22 2022 - 16:08:49 EST


This summary will help to guide the proper use of the enabling model.

Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Changes from v4:
* Re-write about the sigaltstack sizing (Dave Hansen).
* Drop the second point as the case is not clear yet.

Changes from v3:
* Add as a new patch (Tony Luck).
---
Documentation/x86/xstate.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst b/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
index 5cec7fb558d6..e954e79af4ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/xstate.rst
@@ -11,6 +11,22 @@ are enabled by XCR0 as well, but the first use of related instruction is
trapped by the kernel because by default the required large XSTATE buffers
are not allocated automatically.

+The purpose for dynamic features
+--------------------------------
+
+Legacy userspace libraries often have hard-coded, static sizes for
+alternate signal stacks, often using MINSIGSTKSZ which is typically 2KB.
+That stack must be able to store at *least* the signal frame that the
+kernel sets up before jumping into the signal handler. That signal frame
+must include an XSAVE buffer defined by the CPU.
+
+However, that means that the size of signal stacks is dynamic, not static,
+because different CPUs have differently-sized XSAVE buffers. A compiled-in
+size of 2KB with existing applications is too small for new CPU features
+like AMX. Instead of universally requiring larger stack, with the dynamic
+enabling, the kernel can enforce userspace applications to have
+properly-sized altstacks.
+
Using dynamically enabled XSTATE features in user space applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--
2.17.1