Re: [PATCH v4] usb: dwc3: Don't switch OTG -> peripheral if extcon is present

[Andrey Smirnov]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:23 AM Ferry Toth <fntoth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22-09-2022 12:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 09:49:07AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>
> If the extcon device exists, get the mode from the extcon device. If
> the controller is DRD and the driver is unable to determine the mode,
> only then default the dr_mode to USB_DR_MODE_PERIPHERAL.
>
> According to Ferry (Cc'ed) this broke Intel Merrifield platform. Ferry, can you
> share bisect log?
>
> I can but not right now. But what I did was bisect between 5.18.0 (good) and 5.19.0 (bad) then when I got near the culprit (~20 remaining) based on the commit message I tried 0f01017191384e3962fa31520a9fd9846c3d352f "usb: dwc3: Don't switch OTG -> peripheral if extcon is present" (bad) and commit before that (good).
>
> The effect of the patch is that on Merrifield (I tested with Intel Edison Arduino board which has a HW switch to select between host and device mode) device mode works but in host mode USB is completely not working.
>
> Currently on host mode - when working - superfluous error messages from tusb1210 appear. When host mode is not working there are no tusb1210 messages in the logs / on the console at all. Seemingly tusb1210 is not probed, which points in the direction of a relation to extcon.
>
> Taking into account the late cycle, I would like to revert the change. And
> Ferry and I would help to test any other (non-regressive) approach).
>
> I have not yet tested if a simple revert fixes the problem but will tonight.
>
>
> I would be happy to test other approaches too.


It's a bit hard for me to suggest an alternative approach without
knowing how things are breaking in this case. I'd love to order one of
those boards to repro and fix this on my end, but it looks like this
HW is EOLed and out of stock in most places. If you guys know how to
get my hands on those boards I'm all ears.

Barring that, Ferry can you dig more into this failure? E.g. is it this hunk

@@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ static int dwc3_get_dr_mode(struct dwc3 *dwc)
                 * mode. If the controller supports DRD but the dr_mode is not
                 * specified or set to OTG, then set the mode to peripheral.
                 */
-               if (mode == USB_DR_MODE_OTG &&
+               if (mode == USB_DR_MODE_OTG && !dwc->edev &&
                    (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH) ||
                     !device_property_read_bool(dwc->dev, "usb-role-switch")) &&
                    !DWC3_VER_IS_PRIOR(DWC3, 330A))
@@ -1632,6 +1633,51 @@ static void dwc3_check_params(struct dwc3 *dwc)
        }
 }

that's problematic or moving

 static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct device           *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1744,6 +1790,13 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                goto err2;
        }

+       dwc->edev = dwc3_get_extcon(dwc);
+       if (IS_ERR(dwc->edev)) {
+               ret = PTR_ERR(dwc->edev);
+               dev_err_probe(dwc->dev, ret, "failed to get extcon\n");
+               goto err3;
+       }
+
        ret = dwc3_get_dr_mode(dwc);
        if (ret)
                goto err3;

to happen earlier? Does tracing the "mrfld_bcove_pwrsrc" driver (the
excton provider in this case AFIACT) show anything interesting?