Re: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]

From: Bart Van Assche
Date: Thu Sep 22 2022 - 19:56:16 EST

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter"
Previous message: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH v3] perf tools: Get a perf cgroup more portably in BPF"
In reply to: Damien Le Moal: "Re: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]"
Next in thread: Matias Bjørling: "RE: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9/21/22 16:55, Damien Le Moal wrote:

But again, that all depends on if Pankaj patch series is accepted, that
is, on everybody accepting that we lift the power-of-2 zone size constraint.

The companies that are busy with implementing zoned storage for UFS devices are asking for kernel support for non-power-of-2 zone sizes.

Thanks,

Bart.

Next message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Defer counter emulated overflow via pmc->prev_counter"
Previous message: Ian Rogers: "Re: [PATCH v3] perf tools: Get a perf cgroup more portably in BPF"
In reply to: Damien Le Moal: "Re: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]"
Next in thread: Matias Bjørling: "RE: Please further explain Linux's "zoned storage" roadmap [was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/13] support zoned block devices with non-power-of-2 zone sizes]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]