Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices

[Logan Gunthorpe]

On 2022-09-23 00:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Thanks, the entire series looks good to me now:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> Given that this is spread all over, what tree do we want to take it
> through?

Yes, while this is ostensibly a feature for NVMe it turns out we didn't
need to touch any NVMe code at all.

The most likely patch in my mind to have conflicts is the iov_iter patch
as there's been a lot of churn there in the last few cycles and there
are continued discussions.

There are 2 PCI patches, but Bjorn's aware of them and has acked them.
I'm also fairly confident this shouldn't conflict with anything in his tree.

Besides that, there is one mm/gup patch which is the next likely to
conflict; one scatterlist patch and three block layer patches which have
largely been stable when I've done rebases.

Logan