Re: [PATCH v4] Makefile.debug: re-enable debug info for .S files

From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Fri Sep 23 2022 - 22:20:25 EST


On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:12 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch still misses the debug info for *.S files
> for the combination of LLVM_IAS=0 and
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y
> because, as the comment says, Clang does not pass -g down to GAS.
>
>
> With "[v4] Makefile.debug: set -g unconditional on CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT"
> and this one applied,
>
>
>
> $ grep CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF .config
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4 is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5 is not set
> $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=0 arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o
> SYNC include/config/auto.conf.cmd
> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_32_ia32.h
> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_64_x32.h
> SYSTBL arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h
> HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_32.o
> [snip]
> AS arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o
> $ objdump -h arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o | grep debug
> $
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think the following fix-up is needed on top.
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.debug b/scripts/Makefile.debug
> index d6aecd78b942..8cf1cb22dd93 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.debug
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.debug
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -DEBUG_CFLAGS := -g
> +DEBUG_CFLAGS :=
> +debug-flags-y := -g
>
> ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT
> DEBUG_CFLAGS += -gsplit-dwarf
>
>
>
>
> Then, I can see the debug sections.
>
>
>
> $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=0 arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> DESCEND objtool
> AS arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o
> $ objdump -h arch/x86/kernel/irqflags.o | grep debug
> 6 .debug_line 00000050 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000008f 2**0
> 7 .debug_info 0000002e 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000f8 2**0
> 8 .debug_abbrev 00000014 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001d0 2**0
> 9 .debug_aranges 00000030 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001f0 2**4
> 10 .debug_str 0000004d 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000250 2**0
>
>
>
>
>
> If you agree, I can locally fix it up as such.

Ah, sorry I missed testing that combination. Thanks for your
thoroughness. Yes please apply that diff on top.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers