Re: [PATCH 6/7] nouveau/dmem: Evict device private memory during release
From: Felix Kuehling
Date: Mon Sep 26 2022 - 19:07:35 EST
On 2022-09-26 17:35, Lyude Paul wrote:
On Mon, 2022-09-26 at 16:03 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
When the module is unloaded or a GPU is unbound from the module it is
possible for device private pages to be left mapped in currently running
processes. This leads to a kernel crash when the pages are either freed
or accessed from the CPU because the GPU and associated data structures
and callbacks have all been freed.
Fix this by migrating any mappings back to normal CPU memory prior to
freeing the GPU memory chunks and associated device private pages.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I assume the AMD driver might have a similar issue. However I can't see
where device private (or coherent) pages actually get unmapped/freed
during teardown as I couldn't find any relevant calls to
devm_memunmap(), memunmap(), devm_release_mem_region() or
release_mem_region(). So it appears that ZONE_DEVICE pages are not being
properly freed during module unload, unless I'm missing something?
I've got no idea, will poke Ben to see if they know the answer to this
I guess we're relying on devm to release the region. Isn't the whole
point of using devm_request_free_mem_region that we don't have to
remember to explicitly release it when the device gets destroyed? I
believe we had an explicit free call at some point by mistake, and that
caused a double-free during module unload. See this commit for reference:
commit 22f4f4faf337d5fb2d2750aff13215726814273e
Author: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Sep 20 17:25:52 2021 -0400
drm/amdkfd: fix svm_migrate_fini warning
Device manager releases device-specific resources when a driver
disconnects from a device, devm_memunmap_pages and
devm_release_mem_region calls in svm_migrate_fini are redundant.
It causes below warning trace after patch "drm/amdgpu: Split
amdgpu_device_fini into early and late", so remove function
svm_migrate_fini.
BUG: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1718
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at drivers/base/devres.c:795
devm_release_action+0x51/0x60
Call Trace:
? memunmap_pages+0x360/0x360
svm_migrate_fini+0x2d/0x60 [amdgpu]
kgd2kfd_device_exit+0x23/0xa0 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_amdkfd_device_fini_sw+0x1d/0x30 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_device_fini_sw+0x45/0x290 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_driver_release_kms+0x12/0x30 [amdgpu]
drm_dev_release+0x20/0x40 [drm]
release_nodes+0x196/0x1e0
device_release_driver_internal+0x104/0x1d0
driver_detach+0x47/0x90
bus_remove_driver+0x7a/0xd0
pci_unregister_driver+0x3d/0x90
amdgpu_exit+0x11/0x20 [amdgpu]
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Furthermore, I guess we are assuming that nobody is using the GPU when
the module is unloaded. As long as any processes have /dev/kfd open, you
won't be able to unload the module (except by force-unload). I suppose
with ZONE_DEVICE memory, we can have references to device memory pages
even when user mode has closed /dev/kfd. We do have a cleanup handler
that runs in an MMU-free-notifier. In theory that should run after all
the pages in the mm_struct have been freed. It releases all sorts of
other device resources and needs the driver to still be there. I'm not
sure if there is anything preventing a module unload before the
free-notifier runs. I'll look into that.
Regards,
Felix
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
index 66ebbd4..3b247b8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
@@ -369,6 +369,52 @@ nouveau_dmem_suspend(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
mutex_unlock(&drm->dmem->mutex);
}
+/*
+ * Evict all pages mapping a chunk.
+ */
+void
+nouveau_dmem_evict_chunk(struct nouveau_dmem_chunk *chunk)
+{
+ unsigned long i, npages = range_len(&chunk->pagemap.range) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long *src_pfns, *dst_pfns;
+ dma_addr_t *dma_addrs;
+ struct nouveau_fence *fence;
+
+ src_pfns = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*src_pfns), GFP_KERNEL);
+ dst_pfns = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*dst_pfns), GFP_KERNEL);
+ dma_addrs = kcalloc(npages, sizeof(*dma_addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ migrate_device_range(src_pfns, chunk->pagemap.range.start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ npages);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
+ if (src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) {
+ struct page *dpage;
+
+ /*
+ * _GFP_NOFAIL because the GPU is going away and there
+ * is nothing sensible we can do if we can't copy the
+ * data back.
+ */
You'll have to excuse me for a moment since this area of nouveau isn't one of
my strongpoints, but are we sure about this? IIRC __GFP_NOFAIL means infinite
retry, in the case of a GPU hotplug event I would assume we would rather just
stop trying to migrate things to the GPU and just drop the data instead of
hanging on infinite retries.
+ dpage = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_NOFAIL);
+ dst_pfns[i] = migrate_pfn(page_to_pfn(dpage));
+ nouveau_dmem_copy_one(chunk->drm,
+ migrate_pfn_to_page(src_pfns[i]), dpage,
+ &dma_addrs[i]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ nouveau_fence_new(chunk->drm->dmem->migrate.chan, false, &fence);
+ migrate_device_pages(src_pfns, dst_pfns, npages);
+ nouveau_dmem_fence_done(&fence);
+ migrate_device_finalize(src_pfns, dst_pfns, npages);
+ kfree(src_pfns);
+ kfree(dst_pfns);
+ for (i = 0; i < npages; i++)
+ dma_unmap_page(chunk->drm->dev->dev, dma_addrs[i], PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ kfree(dma_addrs);
+}
+
void
nouveau_dmem_fini(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
{
@@ -380,8 +426,10 @@ nouveau_dmem_fini(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
mutex_lock(&drm->dmem->mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp, &drm->dmem->chunks, list) {
+ nouveau_dmem_evict_chunk(chunk);
nouveau_bo_unpin(chunk->bo);
nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, &chunk->bo);
+ WARN_ON(chunk->callocated);
list_del(&chunk->list);
memunmap_pages(&chunk->pagemap);
release_mem_region(chunk->pagemap.range.start,