Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf: Skip and warn on unknown format 'configN' attrs
From: Leo Yan
Date: Thu Sep 29 2022 - 02:48:14 EST
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:08:34PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
[...]
> +void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_formats(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + struct perf_pmu_format *format;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(format, &pmu->format, list)
> + if (format->value >= PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG_END) {
> + pr_warning("WARNING: '%s' format '%s' requires 'perf_event_attr::config%d'"
> + "which is not supported by this version of perf!\n",
> + pmu->name, format->name, format->value);
> + return;
> + }
> +}
Though I saw you and Namhyung have discussion in underway, this patch
set is fine for me. I validated the patches at my side (with a bit
hacking in Arm SPE driver for faking invert filter). You could add my
tested tag for this patch set:
Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
But I want to remind two things after I used "perf test" to validate
this patch set:
$ ./perf test list
6: Parse event definition strings
6:1: Test event parsing
6:2: Test parsing of "hybrid" CPU events
6:3: Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs
6:4: Parsing of given PMU events from sysfs
6:5: Parsing of aliased events from sysfs
6:6: Parsing of aliased events
6:7: Parsing of terms (event modifiers)
$ ./perf test -v 6
The first one is this patch set introduces segmentation fault for the
case "Parsing of aliased events" (See tests/parse-events.c). But the
issue is caused by the test case itself; we need to add below line into
test_event_fake_pmu() for initialisation list header.
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&perf_pmu__fake.format);
The second question is for testing config3 in "perf test". You could
see the file tests/parse-events.c has included several test cases for
config/config1/config2. It's good to add the same testing for config3
as well, please see test__checkevent_pmu() and test__checkterms_simple()
for relevant code.
Thanks,
Leo