Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking

[Daniel Latypov]

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:15 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:26 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Note: this does change the function signature of
> > kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in
> > https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs,
> > but hopefully it's just a simple change, e.g. maybe just like:
>
> Yeah, should be simple. Thanks for pointing it out!
>
> The series looks like a great cleanup on top of the stack reduction.

Thanks for taking a look at the rest of the series as well.

While I have you here, any thoughts on how to coordinate the change?
I made the breaking change patch#1 so it should be easier to pull out.

One option I was thinking was:
* wait till this lands in Shuah's tree
* I create a Github PR that contains patch#1 + a patch for kunit.rs

I was not clear on how the RfL Github pulls in upstream changes or how often.
But my assumption is patch#1 would fall away naturally if rebasing
onto 6.1 (and maybe we can squash the kunit.rs change).

Thanks,
Daniel