On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:32:49PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
What my current thinking is to make llist works with both NULL and sentinelWouldn't that be more error-prone in the long term? I'd just bite the bullet
terminated lockless list. Users who wish to use the sentinel terminated
version will have to use special sentinel version of LLIST_HEAD() macro and
llist_del_all() and __llist_del_all() functions. In this way, I don't need
to touch an existing users of llist while minimizing code redundancy. What
do you think?
and convert the empty tests. It is a hassle to find them but given that it's
just the head node testing, it hopefully wouldn't be too bad.