Re: [PATCH v9 000/105] KVM TDX basic feature support

[Isaku Yamahata]

On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 03:30:44PM +0700,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 03:16:54AM -0700, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > KVM TDX basic feature support
> > 
> > Hello.  This is v9 the patch series vof KVM TDX support.
> > This is based on v6.0-rc7 + the following patch series with minor update like
> > compile fix.
> > 
> > - TDX host kernel support v5
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1655894131.git.kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx/
> > - kvm hardware initialization v5
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1663869838.git.isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx/
> > - fd-based approach for supporing KVM v8
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220915142913.2213336-1-chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > The tree can be found at https://github.com/intel/tdx/tree/kvm-upstream
> > How to run/test: It's describe at https://github.com/intel/tdx/wiki/TDX-KVM
> > 
> > Major changes from v8:
> > - rebased to v6.0-rc7
> > - Integrated with kvm hardware initialization.  Check all packages has at least
> >   one online CPU when creating guest TD and refuse cpu offline during guest TDs
> >   are running.
> > - Integrated fd-based private page v8 as prerequisite.
> > - TDP MMU: Introduced more callbacks instead of single callback.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Isaku Yamahata
> > 
> 
> Hi Isaku,
> 
> I'm still getting the same htmldocs warnings as in v8 (see [1]). It seems
> like the fixup there has not been applied to this version.
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YvCHRuq8B69UMSuq@xxxxxxxxx/

Hi. Thanks for testing it.

Those errors came from TDX host kernel support patch. [2]. Added Kai, the author
of the patch series.  As You've already pointed out, it will be fixed by the
next respin of the patch series.

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0712bc0b05a0c6c42437fba68f82d9268ab3113e.1655894131.git.kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx/

thanks,
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>