On October 3, 2022 4:01:01 PM PDT, Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. Is the consensus that we should use the
readl function here or instead use inline assembly directly as in the patch
I originally sent out:
asm_inline("movl %1, %0" : "=r"(out) : "m"(*addr));
? The readl function has this exact same code, I'm just not sure
which version fits better stylistically.
Is mov with an arbitrary addressing mode still acceptable for whatever is causing this problem?