Re: [PATCH] iommu: fsl_pamu: Replace NO_IRQ by 0

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Thu Oct 06 2022 - 06:35:05 EST


On 2022-10-06 06:24, Christophe Leroy wrote:
NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().

On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.

irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.

So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.

Crucially, NO_IRQ *is* 0 on PowerPC where this driver actually runs, so there's no functional issue here. However the justification for cleaning it up makes perfect sense overall.

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
index 0d03f837a5d4..1b53d2da2c19 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
of_get_address(dev->of_node, 0, &size, NULL);
irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);
- if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
+ if (!irq) {
dev_warn(dev, "no interrupts listed in PAMU node\n");
goto error;
}
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
error:
- if (irq != NO_IRQ)
+ if (irq)
free_irq(irq, data);
kfree_sensitive(data);