Re: [syzbot] memory leak in __get_metapage

From: Fabio M. De Francesco
Date: Thu Oct 06 2022 - 15:43:17 EST


On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 10:49:42 AM CEST syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 4fe89d07dcc2 Linux 6.0
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=169a7924880000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=21254cf9c7c084e0
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=389b82b29093b3e2640a
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils
for Debian) 2.35.2
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10bdd7ec880000
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/651a252f7035/
disk-4fe89d07.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/776feb8e0e5b/
vmlinux-4fe89d07.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+389b82b29093b3e2640a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff888114339e80 (size 128):
> comm "syz-executor.0", pid 3673, jiffies 4295017005 (age 12.610s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff814927b3>] mempool_alloc+0x73/0x230 mm/mempool.c:392
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] alloc_metapage fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:176 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] __get_metapage+0x38a/0x9b0 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:651
> [<ffffffff81c43862>] diNewExt+0x3f2/0x9d0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2265
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1945 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocAG+0x9a4/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1662
> [<ffffffff81c4707f>] diAlloc+0x31f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1583
> [<ffffffff81c57d9a>] ialloc+0x6a/0x3a0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
> [<ffffffff81c3a4c7>] jfs_mkdir+0xf7/0x480 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
> [<ffffffff815fc703>] vfs_mkdir+0x223/0x340 fs/namei.c:4013
> [<ffffffff816056e5>] do_mkdirat+0x1a5/0x1e0 fs/namei.c:4038
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4058 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4056 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x69/0x90 fs/namei.c:4056
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff888114339e00 (size 128):
> comm "syz-executor.0", pid 3673, jiffies 4295017005 (age 12.610s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff814927b3>] mempool_alloc+0x73/0x230 mm/mempool.c:392
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] alloc_metapage fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:176 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] __get_metapage+0x38a/0x9b0 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:651
> [<ffffffff81c43862>] diNewExt+0x3f2/0x9d0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2265
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1945 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocAG+0x9a4/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1662
> [<ffffffff81c4707f>] diAlloc+0x31f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1583
> [<ffffffff81c57d9a>] ialloc+0x6a/0x3a0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
> [<ffffffff81c3a4c7>] jfs_mkdir+0xf7/0x480 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
> [<ffffffff815fc703>] vfs_mkdir+0x223/0x340 fs/namei.c:4013
> [<ffffffff816056e5>] do_mkdirat+0x1a5/0x1e0 fs/namei.c:4038
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4058 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4056 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x69/0x90 fs/namei.c:4056
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff888114339d80 (size 128):
> comm "syz-executor.0", pid 3673, jiffies 4295017005 (age 12.610s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff814927b3>] mempool_alloc+0x73/0x230 mm/mempool.c:392
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] alloc_metapage fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:176 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] __get_metapage+0x38a/0x9b0 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:651
> [<ffffffff81c43862>] diNewExt+0x3f2/0x9d0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2265
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1945 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocAG+0x9a4/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1662
> [<ffffffff81c4707f>] diAlloc+0x31f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1583
> [<ffffffff81c57d9a>] ialloc+0x6a/0x3a0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
> [<ffffffff81c3a4c7>] jfs_mkdir+0xf7/0x480 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
> [<ffffffff815fc703>] vfs_mkdir+0x223/0x340 fs/namei.c:4013
> [<ffffffff816056e5>] do_mkdirat+0x1a5/0x1e0 fs/namei.c:4038
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4058 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4056 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x69/0x90 fs/namei.c:4056
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff8881142f0300 (size 128):
> comm "syz-executor.0", pid 3676, jiffies 4295017533 (age 7.330s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff814927b3>] mempool_alloc+0x73/0x230 mm/mempool.c:392
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] alloc_metapage fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:176 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c5aefa>] __get_metapage+0x38a/0x9b0 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:651
> [<ffffffff81c43862>] diNewExt+0x3f2/0x9d0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2265
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1945 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81c45254>] diAllocAG+0x9a4/0xd50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1662
> [<ffffffff81c4707f>] diAlloc+0x31f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1583
> [<ffffffff81c57d9a>] ialloc+0x6a/0x3a0 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
> [<ffffffff81c3a4c7>] jfs_mkdir+0xf7/0x480 fs/jfs/namei.c:225
> [<ffffffff815fc703>] vfs_mkdir+0x223/0x340 fs/namei.c:4013
> [<ffffffff816056e5>] do_mkdirat+0x1a5/0x1e0 fs/namei.c:4038
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4058 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4056 [inline]
> [<ffffffff81605859>] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x69/0x90 fs/namei.c:4056
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> [<ffffffff845eab95>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>

I'm still providing the "syz test" command with wrong syntax.
Let's try what I found in older tests of mine...

#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
master