Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: correct i_size change for atomic writes

[Chao Yu]

On 2022/10/7 22:22, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > Fine to me.
> >
> > But another question is, now it allows GC to migrate blocks belong
> > to atomic files, so, during migration, it may update extent cache,
> > once largest extent was updated, it will mark inode dirty, but after
> > this patch, it may lose the extent change? thoughts?
>
> Oh, I missed that case. Maybe we could prevent updating the i_size of
> atomic files in f2fs_update_inode() while allowing inode dirtying.

Agreed. :)

Thanks,