Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/gsseg: use the LKGS instruction if available for load_gs_index()

From: Brian Gerst
Date: Fri Oct 07 2022 - 12:19:06 EST


On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:19 PM Xin Li <xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The LKGS instruction atomically loads a segment descriptor into the
> %gs descriptor registers, *except* that %gs.base is unchanged, and the
> base is instead loaded into MSR_IA32_KERNEL_GS_BASE, which is exactly
> what we want this function to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/gsseg.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/gsseg.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/gsseg.h
> index 5e3b56a17098..b8a6a98d88b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/gsseg.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/gsseg.h
> @@ -3,15 +3,41 @@
> #define _ASM_X86_GSSEG_H
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/asm.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/nops.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>
> extern asmlinkage void asm_load_gs_index(u16 selector);
>
> +#define LKGS_DI _ASM_BYTES(0xf2,0x0f,0x00,0xf7)
> +
> static inline void native_load_gs_index(unsigned int selector)
> {
> - asm_load_gs_index(selector);
> + u16 sel = selector;
> +
> + /*
> + * Note: the fixup is used for the LKGS instruction, but
> + * it needs to be attached to the primary instruction sequence
> + * as it isn't something that gets patched.
> + *
> + * %rax is provided to the assembly routine as a scratch
> + * register.
> + */
> + alternative_io("1: call asm_load_gs_index\n"
> + ".pushsection \".fixup\",\"ax\"\n"
> + "2: xorl %k[sel], %k[sel]\n"
> + " jmp 1b\n"
> + ".popsection\n"
> + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b),
> + _ASM_BYTES(0x3e) LKGS_DI,
> + X86_FEATURE_LKGS,
> + ASM_OUTPUT2([sel] "+D" (sel), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT),
> + ASM_NO_INPUT_CLOBBER(_ASM_AX));
> }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
> --
> 2.34.1

There are not that many call sites, so using something like this
(incorporating Peter Z's suggestion for the exception handler) would
be better from a code readability perspective vs. a tiny increase in
code size.

if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LKGS))
asm volatile("1: " LKGS_DI
_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE_REG(1b, 1b,
EX_TYPE_ZERO_REG, %k[sel])
: [sel] "+D" (sel) : : "memory");
else
asm_load_gs_index(sel);

--
Brian Gerst