Re: [PATCH V6 09/11] riscv: Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin

[Guo Ren]

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 7:34 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 09:24:49PM -0400, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Dao Lu <daolu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add support for STACKLEAK gcc plugin to riscv by implementing
> > stackleak_check_alloca, based heavily on the arm64 version, and
> > modifying the entry.S. Additionally, this disables the plugin for EFI
> > stub code for riscv. All modifications base on generic_entry.
>
> I think this commit message is stale; `stackleak_check_alloca` doesn't exist
> any more.
>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220615213834.3116135-1-daolu@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Dao Lu <daolu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Conor Dooley <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                    | 1 +
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S             | 8 +++++++-
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index dfe600f3526c..76bde12d9f8c 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ config RISCV
> >       select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
> >       select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS if COMPAT
> >       select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
> > +     select HAVE_ARCH_STACKLEAK
> >       select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> >       select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE if 64BIT && MMU
> >       select ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > index 5f49517cd3a2..39097c1474a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ END(handle_exception)
> >  ENTRY(ret_from_exception)
> >       REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp)
> >
> > -     csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE
> >       /* the MPP value is too large to be used as an immediate arg for addi */
> >       li t0, SR_MPP
> > @@ -139,6 +138,9 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_exception)
> >       andi s0, s0, SR_SPP
> >  #endif
> >       bnez s0, 1f
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK
> > +     call stackleak_erase
> > +#endif
>
> I assume this can happen on an arbitrary stack, and so you can't use the
> stackleak_erase_{on,off}_task_stack variants?
I misunderstood before.

Yes, riscv could use stackleak_erase_on_task_stack. Because the sp has
changed to task_stack, even when irq/soft_irq.

>
> Just to check, have you given this a spin with LKDTM and the STACKLEAK_ERASING
> test? If not, it'd be good to test that (and ideally, put some sample output
> from that into the commit message).
>
> For example, as per:
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220427173128.2603085-1-mark.rutland@xxxxxxx/
>
> ... on arm64 this looks something like:
>
> | # uname -a
> | Linux buildroot 5.18.0-rc1-00013-g26f638ab0d7c #3 SMP PREEMPT Wed Apr 27 16:21:37 BST 2022 aarch64 GNU/Linux
> | # echo STACKLEAK_ERASING > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
> | lkdtm: Performing direct entry STACKLEAK_ERASING
> | lkdtm: stackleak stack usage:
> |   high offset: 336 bytes
> |   current:     688 bytes
> |   lowest:      1232 bytes
> |   tracked:     1232 bytes
> |   untracked:   672 bytes
> |   poisoned:    14136 bytes
> |   low offset:  8 bytes
> | lkdtm: OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> >
> >       /* Save unwound kernel stack pointer in thread_info */
> >       addi s0, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
> > @@ -148,8 +150,12 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_exception)
> >        * Save TP into the scratch register , so we can find the kernel data
> >        * structures again.
> >        */
> > +     csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE
> >       csrw CSR_SCRATCH, tp
> > +     j 2f
> >  1:
> > +     csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE
> > +2:
> >       /*
> >        * The current load reservation is effectively part of the processor's
> >        * state, in the sense that load reservations cannot be shared between
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > index d0537573501e..5e1fc4f82883 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile
> > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARM)                := $(subst $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE),,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) \
> >                                  -fno-builtin -fpic \
> >                                  $(call cc-option,-mno-single-pic-base)
> >  cflags-$(CONFIG_RISCV)               := $(subst $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE),,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) \
> > -                                -fpic
> > +                                -fpic $(DISABLE_STACKLEAK_PLUGIN)
> >
> >  cflags-$(CONFIG_EFI_GENERIC_STUB) += -I$(srctree)/scripts/dtc/libfdt
> >
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren