Re: [PATCH 03/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdru1000: Add tlmm nodes

From: Melody Olvera
Date: Tue Oct 11 2022 - 14:41:00 EST




On 10/1/2022 12:26 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 06:09, Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Add tlmm node for the QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs and the uart pin
>> configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdru1000.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdru1000.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdru1000.dtsi
>> index 3610f94bef35..39b9a00d3ad8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdru1000.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdru1000.dtsi
>> @@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ uart7: serial@99c000 {
>> reg = <0x0 0x99c000 0x0 0x4000>;
>> clock-names = "se";
>> clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_WRAP0_S7_CLK>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&qup_uart7_default>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 608 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> @@ -248,6 +250,34 @@ tcsr_mutex: hwlock@1f40000 {
>> #hwlock-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> + tlmm: pinctrl@f000000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-tlmm", "qcom,qru1000-tlmm";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xf000000 0x0 0x1000000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 208 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> + gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 151>;
>> + wakeup-parent = <&pdc>;
>> +
>> + qup_uart7_default: qup-uart7-default {
>> + tx {
>> + pins = "gpio134";
>> + function = "qup0_se7_l2";
> This looks strange. Usually we'd have a single 'qup7' function here.
> I'd go back to the interconnect driver. Maybe the functions are not
> correctly defined there.
Yeah; will correct. Pinctrl driver was not in line with upstream standards.
>
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + bias-disable;
> 'drive-strength' and 'bias-disable' are to be patched in in the board dts file.
Really? Looking at sm8450.dtsi and sm8350.dtsi I see them defined in the dtsi file instead of the
dts file. Is this new?
>
>> + };
>> +
>> + rx {
>> + pins = "gpio135";
>> + function = "qup0_se7_l3";
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>> compatible = "qcom,pdc";
>> reg = <0x0 0xb220000 0x0 0x30000>, <0x0 0x174000f0 0x0 0x64>;
>> --
>> 2.37.3
>>
>
Thanks,
Melody