Re: [PATCH v0 4/8] sk_cipher: checking for hw bound operation

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

In the short summary, please try to use imperative form and
accurate names. "Checking" means nothing.

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:38:33PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Checking for hw bound key. If yes,
>  - skipping the key-length validation to fall in min-max range.

What does "-" mean here? I seriously cannot interpret what I'm
reading.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  crypto/skcipher.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/crypto/skcipher.c b/crypto/skcipher.c
> index 418211180cee..0f2d0228d73e 100644
> --- a/crypto/skcipher.c
> +++ b/crypto/skcipher.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,8 @@ int crypto_skcipher_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *key,
>  	unsigned long alignmask = crypto_skcipher_alignmask(tfm);
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (keylen < cipher->min_keysize || keylen > cipher->max_keysize)
> +	if ((!tfm->base.is_hbk)
> +	    && (keylen < cipher->min_keysize || keylen > cipher->max_keysize))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if ((unsigned long)key & alignmask)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>

BR, Jarkko