Re: [RFC PATCH v5 3/6] drm/tidss: Add support for AM625 DSS

[Tomi Valkeinen]

On 28/09/2022 20:52, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> Add support for the DSS controller on TI's new AM625 SoC in the tidss
> driver.
>
> The first video port (VP0) in am625-dss can output OLDI signals through
> 2 OLDI TXes. A 3rd port has been added with "DISPC_VP_OLDI" bus type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.h |  3 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c   |  1 +
>   3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> index dd3c6a606ae2..34f0da4bb3e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ const struct dispc_features dispc_k2g_feats = {
>   	.common_regs = tidss_k2g_common_regs,
>   
>   	.num_vps = 1,
> +	.num_max_ports = 1,

I would just use "num_ports" here, as it describes the HW (e.g. we have 
num_vps = 4 for J7, even if we'd only use one of the VPs).

I would also rename "TIDSS_MAX_PORTS". Maybe TIDSS_MAX_VPS. And check 
carefully that it's never used for the output ports.

Or maybe this field should be "num_output_ports", and try to use "output 
port" term in the driver for the..., well, output ports, to make the 
distinction between the videoport and output port more clear.

 Tomi