Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix "Track with sched_switch" test by not printing warnings in quiet mode
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Wed Oct 12 2022 - 12:50:56 EST
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 4:13 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/2022 12:10, James Clark wrote:
> > Especially when CONFIG_LOCKDEP and other debug configs are enabled,
> > Perf can print the following warning when running the "Track with
> > sched_switch" test:
>
> Oops got the wrong test name here and in the title. Should be "kernel
> lock contention analysis test"
Could you please resend?
>
> >
> > Warning:
> > Processed 1378918 events and lost 4 chunks!
> >
> > Check IO/CPU overload!
> >
> > Warning:
> > Processed 4593325 samples and lost 70.00%!
> >
> > The test already supplies -q to run in quiet mode, so extend quiet mode
> > to perf_stdio__warning() and also ui__warning() for consistency.
I'm not sure if suppressing the warnings with -q is a good thing.
Maybe we need to separate warning/debug messages from the output.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> >
> > This fixes the following failure due to the extra lines counted:
> >
> > perf test "lock cont" -vvv
> >
> > 82: kernel lock contention analysis test :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 3125
> > Testing perf lock record and perf lock contention
> > [Fail] Recorded result count is not 1: 9
> > test child finished with -1
> > ---- end ----
> > kernel lock contention analysis test: FAILED!
> >
> > Fixes: ec685de25b67 ("perf test: Add kernel lock contention test")
> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/ui/util.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/util.c b/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> > index 689b27c34246..1d38ddf01b60 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/ui/util.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ static int perf_stdio__error(const char *format, va_list args)
> >
> > static int perf_stdio__warning(const char *format, va_list args)
> > {
> > + if (quiet)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > fprintf(stderr, "Warning:\n");
> > vfprintf(stderr, format, args);
> > return 0;
> > @@ -45,6 +48,8 @@ int ui__warning(const char *format, ...)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > va_list args;
> > + if (quiet)
> > + return 0;
> >
> > va_start(args, format);
> > ret = perf_eops->warning(format, args);