Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Wed Oct 12 2022 - 14:11:17 EST


On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:07:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event
> automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the
> handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events.
>
> Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing
> by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to
> acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because
> rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object
> pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in
> cmos_do_probe().
>
> This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot
> if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time.
>
> To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the
> driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful
> cmos_do_probe() call.
>
> While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after
> the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to
> be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in
> each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int,
> because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int).
>
> Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check
> ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number
> of systems, because previously it only affected systems with
> ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that
> commit.
>
> Fixes: 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0")
> Fixes: a474aaedac99 ("rtc-cmos: move wake setup from ACPI glue into RTC driver")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20221010141630.zfzi7mk7zvnmclzy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

Works for me so;

Tested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs